- A federal judge in Richard Gergel ruled that Aleksa Merdoga’s lawsuit against Becki G should be dismissed.
- The judge found that the lawsuit’s claims were unlikely to succeed because Merdoga’s lawsuit for defamation against Gell was filed after the statute of limitations had run out.
- Merdoha also alleged that the case was based on an appeal; the judge ruled that the appeal was not properly supported by the evidence.
A federal judge, Richard Gergel, dismissed Aleksa Merdoga’s lawsuit against Becki G, saying the claims about defamation were not properly supported by the evidence.
In material published by CNN, it is stated that Merdoga sued in 2023. Earlier this year, the lawsuit was filed, alleging that “unfounded” comments by Becki G had caused harm.
According to Merdoga’s lawsuit, the defendant’s comments about him violated defamation law. Judge Gergel ruled that the lawsuit was filed after the statute of limitations had expired, and therefore the case could not proceed. The judge also found that Merdoga’s claims were not supported by evidence.
In the CNN material, it is also stated that Gell was not aware of the lawsuit in advance. NBC News, meanwhile, said that Merdoga filed documents stating that the defendant’s comments had caused him financial harm. NBC News also reported that Merdoga claimed that the comments were made in a way that violated federal law. Merdoga’s case was dismissed.